
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.6292321
This study explores the role and challenges of artificial intelligence assistants in academic writing, focusing specifically on generative AI systems that support scholarly publication processes. The study addresses the growing need for transparent guidelines governing AI use in academic contexts while analyzing both the benefits and risks associated with these technologies. Six primary applications of AI assistants in academic writing are systematically examined: reference management, editing, translation, submission optimization, data analysis, and literature review. The study reveals that, although AI assistants can significantly enhance the efficiency and quality in academic writing processes, they also introduce substantial challenges. It is concluded that effective governance requires comprehensive disclosure obligations covering all aspects of AI use, not merely ethical compliance statements. Standardized disclosure rules and robust institutional frameworks are essential to ensure the responsible integration of AI assistants in academic writing.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
