Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6...
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
ZENODO
Project proposal . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project proposal . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Constitutional AI: Governance Standard for Accountable Artificial Agents

Authors: Goukassian, Lev;

Constitutional AI: Governance Standard for Accountable Artificial Agents

Abstract

<span> <div> <p><span>The transition of Artificial Intelligence from probabilistic utility to agentic infrastructure necessitates a fundamental reimagining of algorithmic governance. As systems evolve from passive tools to autonomous decision-makers in high-stakes domains: healthcare, finance, and defense, the limitations of binary classification have become an existential risk. This monograph introduces </span><span>Ternary Moral Logic (TML)</span><span>, a constitutional architecture designed to resolve the "Binary Brittleness" of current deep learning systems.[1] Unlike traditional classifiers that force a collapse into certainty, TML enforces a mandatory third state, the </span><span>Sacred Zero ()</span><span>, representing epistemic ambiguity and moral hesitation.</span></p> <p><span>This document provides the complete </span><span>Technical Specification</span><span> for the "Dual-Lane Latency Architecture," which decouples high-speed inference from cryptographic accountability. It establishes the </span><span>Legal Framework</span><span> for "No Log, No Action" liability, aligning with the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and Federal Rules of Evidence. By embedding these constraints into the runtime kernel, TML transforms AI from a "Black Box" into a "Glass House" of forensic integrity, ensuring that as machines ascend in capability, they remain tethered to the immutable history of their own moral reasoning.</span></p> <p><span>Critically, this standard addresses the operational vulnerabilities inherent in ethical computing. It details the </span><span>Adaptive Throttling Protocol (ATP)</span><span> and </span><span>Cognitive Load Balancing</span><span> mechanisms designed to immunize the system against "Forced Hesitation" attacks. By defining the cryptographic and architectural countermeasures required to harden the "Sacred Zero," the monograph moves beyond theoretical ethics into the realm of </span><span>defensive engineering</span><span>, ensuring that moral deliberation cannot be weaponized as a vector for denial-of-service.</span></p> <p><span>Finally, to ensure the longevity and integrity of this standard, the document charters the </span><span>Goukassian Foundation</span><span> as the institutional custodian of the TML Constitution. Modeled after the IETF and Unicode Consortium, the Foundation provides the certification framework, open-source licensing models, and governance structures necessary to maintain TML as a global public good. This monograph serves as a </span><span>runtime governance kernel</span><span>; its adoption constitutes ratification, establishing a unified compliance baseline for the next generation of accountable artificial agents.</span></p> </div></span>

Keywords

Constitutional AI, computation, Risk Management, Blockchain, accountability, immutable logs, Ternary Moral Logic, al governance, Regulatory Technology, ai ethics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green