<span>This paper examines the conceptual distinction between liberty and freedom through the political thought of Hannah Arendt, challenging the common assumption that the two terms are synonymous. Beginning with an etymological analysis of both concepts, the study traces their historical meanings and evolving political implications. It then explores Arendt’s differentiation between liberation, liberties, and what she calls true or political freedom. While liberation refers to the removal of external constraints and oppression, Arendt argues that genuine freedom requires active participation in public life and engagement within a political community. The paper analyzes how Arendt connects freedom to human action, spontaneity, and collective governance, emphasizing the public and political dimensions of human existence rather than purely private or individual rights. It further considers the tensions and ambiguities in Arendt’s own language, particularly her use of conventional terms such as civil liberties alongside her more specific theoretical distinctions. The study concludes that liberties represent specific guarantees or protections, whereas freedom, in Arendt’s sense, constitutes a broader condition of political agency and a way of life rooted in participation and shared responsibility. By clarifying these distinctions, the paper highlights the continuing relevance of Arendt’s framework for understanding modern political life and the limitations of reducing freedom to individual rights alone.</span>