
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.6177938
Gestures and silent pauses are fundamental in comprehension and communication of emotional speech. Although the effect of gesture inhibition on speech disfluencies is well studied in scripted or non-emotional context, its effect on silent pause behaviour, particularly in spontaneous, emotionally charged narratives remains unexplored. The present study investigates how restricting gestures affects pause behaviour (frequency, duration and proportion), during the narration of negative valence narratives and neutral narratives (daily routine). Silent pauses were categorized using a tri-distribution approach based on length and function: short (250-500ms), medium (500-1000ms) and long (more than 1000ms) pauses. Thirty participants (aged 18 – 23) were divided into gesture-restricted (N = 15) and non-gesture restricted (N = 15). Speech recordings were annotated using ELAN 6.7 and pause measures were analysed using contrast-based mixed effects approach on 4242 observations. Although emotional narratives showed similar effects on speech and pause behaviour across groups, gesture restriction amplified long-pause count, while reducing speech rate and pause proportion across pause types, particularly in emotional narratives. In contrast, long-length pause durations increased in neutral narratives under gesture inhibition. These findings suggest that inhibiting gestures selectively modulates long-pause behaviour, associated with emotional processing and hesitancy, alongside reduced pause proportion in emotional narratives. Results are discussed within psycholinguistic gesture theories and embodied emotion perspectives.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
