
handle: 10419/20672
Many biases plague the analysis of whether employers share rents with their employees, unlike what is predicted by the competitive labour market model. Using a Portuguese matched employer-employee panel, this paper is one of the first to address these biases in three complementary ways: 1) Controlling directly for the fact that firms that share more rents will, ceteris paribus, have lower net-of-wages profits. 2) Instrumenting profits via interactions between the exchange rate and the share of exports in firms' total sales. 3) Considering firm or firm/worker spell fixed effects and highlighting the role of downward wage rigidity. These approaches clarify conflicting findings in the literature and result, in our preferred specifications, in significant evidence of rent sharing (a Lester range of pay dispersion of 56%), also shown to be robust to a number of competitive interpretations.
instrumental variables, fixed effects, Portugal, ddc:330, rent sharing, instumental variables, matched employer-employee data, fixed effects., rent sharing, Lohnbildung, Bias, matched employer-employee data, Lohnverhandlungstheorie, J41, Erfolgsbeteiligung, Social Sciences & Humanities, J31, C33, Schätzung, jel: jel:C33, jel: jel:J31, jel: jel:J41
instrumental variables, fixed effects, Portugal, ddc:330, rent sharing, instumental variables, matched employer-employee data, fixed effects., rent sharing, Lohnbildung, Bias, matched employer-employee data, Lohnverhandlungstheorie, J41, Erfolgsbeteiligung, Social Sciences & Humanities, J31, C33, Schätzung, jel: jel:C33, jel: jel:J31, jel: jel:J41
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 55 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
