
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.602406
handle: 10419/20604
We present a theoretical and empirical analysis of different types of active labor market policies (ALMP). In our empirical analysis, we use data on 20 OECD countries covering the time period 1985-1999. We find that labor market training is the most effective program to bring down unemployment. Public employment services have some impact while subsidized jobs are not effective at all. Our theory considers ALMP in the context of a search-matching model.
unemployment, training, ddc:330, J65, public employment services, J68, active labour market programmes; public employment services; subsidized jobs; training; unemployment, subsidized jobs, Arbeitsmarktpolitik, OECD-Staaten, Wirtschaftspolitische Wirkungsanalyse, Vergleich, H55, active labor market programs, jel: jel:H55, jel: jel:J65, jel: jel:J68
unemployment, training, ddc:330, J65, public employment services, J68, active labour market programmes; public employment services; subsidized jobs; training; unemployment, subsidized jobs, Arbeitsmarktpolitik, OECD-Staaten, Wirtschaftspolitische Wirkungsanalyse, Vergleich, H55, active labor market programs, jel: jel:H55, jel: jel:J65, jel: jel:J68
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 39 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
