
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5960875
handle: 10419/336057 , 11379/638249
Addressing climate change requires policies that are ethically defensible, politically acceptable, and implementable. The concept of a 'just transition'—a decarbonization process that avoids leaving workers and communities behind and mitigates burdens on vulnerable and historically marginalized groups—has gained prominence in academic and policy debates. This paper bridges these debates with insights from environmental economics. We identify and examine four key dimensions of a just transition—distributional, restorative, procedural, and recognition justice—and use them to map existing economic research. We highlight the contributions and limitations of environmental economics in addressing justice concerns and discuss gaps that future research should address to better inform the design of equitable climate policies.
energy transition, just transition, decarbonization, ddc:330, Q50, environmental economics, P18, climate policy, D63, Q56
energy transition, just transition, decarbonization, ddc:330, Q50, environmental economics, P18, climate policy, D63, Q56
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
