
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.57908
Some authors present models in which they show that the Nash bargaining solution fails to be Maskin monotonic and hence cannot be implemented in Nash equilibrium. We find this results misleading and discuss how implementability of the Nash bargaining solution can be discussed in utility space. Arguing that the status quo should be treated as initial endowments, we keep it fixed and show that with this assumption the Nash bargaining solution satisfies Maskin monotonicity. The key property used in the proof is independence of irrelevant alternatives which also turns out to be a necessary condition for implementability. We also show that the Nash bargaining solution satisfies a sufficient condition for implementability independent of the number of agents.
330, Nash-Gleichgewicht, Verhandlungstheorie
330, Nash-Gleichgewicht, Verhandlungstheorie
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
