
We build a model in which financial intermediaries provide insurance to households against idiosyncratic liquidity shocks. Households can invest in financial markets directly if they pay a cost. In equilibrium, the ability of intermediaries to share risk is constrained by the market. From a growth perspective, this can be beneficial because intermediaries invest less in the productive technology when they provide more risk‐sharing. Our model predicts that bank‐oriented economies can grow more slowly than more market‐oriented economies, which is consistent with some recent empirical evidence.
Overlapping Generations, JEL Classification Number: E44, JEL Classification Number: G20, Financial Intermediaries,Risk Sharing,Finance and Growth,Comparing Financial Systems, Growth, Financial Intermediaries, Finanzintermediär, financial markets, G10, Finanzmarkt, Wirtschaftswachstum, JEL Classification Number: G10, ddc:330, Finance and Growth, Comparing Financial Systems, Financial markets, Investition, Financial intermediaries, Intermediation (Finance) ; Financial markets ; Risk, Allokation, E44, G20, Financial intermediaries, financial markets, risk-sharing, growth, Risk Sharing, risk-sharing, jel: jel:E44, jel: jel:G20, jel: jel:G10
Overlapping Generations, JEL Classification Number: E44, JEL Classification Number: G20, Financial Intermediaries,Risk Sharing,Finance and Growth,Comparing Financial Systems, Growth, Financial Intermediaries, Finanzintermediär, financial markets, G10, Finanzmarkt, Wirtschaftswachstum, JEL Classification Number: G10, ddc:330, Finance and Growth, Comparing Financial Systems, Financial markets, Investition, Financial intermediaries, Intermediation (Finance) ; Financial markets ; Risk, Allokation, E44, G20, Financial intermediaries, financial markets, risk-sharing, growth, Risk Sharing, risk-sharing, jel: jel:E44, jel: jel:G20, jel: jel:G10
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
