
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.558588
handle: 11245/1.425228 , 11245/1.420676 , 10419/86249
We develop a model of endogenous lobby formation in which wealth inequality and political accountability undermine entry and financial development. Incumbents seek a low level of effective investor protection to prevent potential entrants from raising capital. They succeed because they can promise larger political contributions than the entrants due to the higher rents earned with less competition. Entry and investor protection improve when wealth distribution becomes less unequal, and the political system becomes more accountable. Consistent with these predictions, in a cross-section of 38 countries we find that greater accountability is associated with higher entry in sectors that are more dependent on external capital and have greater growth opportunities. Also, higher accountability and lower income inequality are associated with more effective legal enforcement, even after controlling for legal origin and per-capita income.
G28, 330, Welt, Income Inequality, Entry, Growth, Markteintritt, Interessenpolitik, G32, Anlegerschutz, ddc:330, Politics, Entrepreneurship, Politics; Entry; Financial Development; Entrepreneurship; Investor protection; Income Inequality; Growth, entrepreneurship; entry; financial development; growth; income inequality; investor protection; politics, Financial Development, G21, Investor protection, Vergleich, jel: jel:G21, jel: jel:G28, jel: jel:G32
G28, 330, Welt, Income Inequality, Entry, Growth, Markteintritt, Interessenpolitik, G32, Anlegerschutz, ddc:330, Politics, Entrepreneurship, Politics; Entry; Financial Development; Entrepreneurship; Investor protection; Income Inequality; Growth, entrepreneurship; entry; financial development; growth; income inequality; investor protection; politics, Financial Development, G21, Investor protection, Vergleich, jel: jel:G21, jel: jel:G28, jel: jel:G32
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 36 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
