Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ https://doi.org/10.2...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3....
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5...
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Trunk injection of fosetyl-Al controls chestnut ink disease with dose-dependent phytotoxicity

Authors: Paula Serrano-Pérez; Gerardo Moreno; Mikel Cebadero; María del Carmen Rodríguez-Molina;

Trunk injection of fosetyl-Al controls chestnut ink disease with dose-dependent phytotoxicity

Abstract

Abstract Fosetyl-Al (aluminium tris-(ethyl phosphonate)) is a low-toxicity phosphonate commonly used to control oomycete-related diseases in crops. Trunk injection (endotherapy) delivers the fungicide directly into the vascular system, potentially improving efficacy while reducing environmental risks. This two-year study evaluated the efficacy and phytotoxicity of trunk-injected fosetyl-Al to manage ink disease caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi in Castanea sativa saplings. Fifty saplings received fosetyl-Al injections at 0–4% using pressurized devices, followed by stem inoculation with the pathogen; a 2% soil irrigation treatment was included for comparison. Trunk injections at 1%, 2% and 4% significantly suppressed stem necrosis and reduced root infections compared to irrigation and untreated control, with protection persisting for at least two years as reflected by reduced relative Area Under the Disease Progress Curve (rAUDPC) values. However, trunk injections also induced phytotoxic symptoms—including leaf burn, necrosis, and occasional plant death—with a clear dose-dependent relationship. While most plants recovered from moderate phytotoxicity, irreversible damage occurred at the highest doses, highlighting the critical need for precise dose adjustments, particularly in small-diameter trees. Logistic regression identified a Minimum Effective Dose (MED) range of 0.061–0.102 g/cm of stem circumference, corresponding to disease incidence targets of < 10% to < 1%, respectively, with phytotoxicity risks estimated between 10% and 25%. These results demonstrate that trunk injection of fosetyl-Al provides effective, targeted, and environmentally friendly control of ink disease, while emphasizing the need for dose optimization to minimize adverse effects.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid