
handle: 10419/20382
This paper analyzes data for a random sample drawn from the Dutch population who reveal their propensity to invest and reward investments in building up social capital by means of an economic experiment.We find substantial heterogeneity and asymmetries in the propensity to invest and in the propensity to reward investments.In particular, we find strong evidence that the young, elderly, and low educated individuals invest relatively less, but are relatively more likely to reward investments in social capital.On the other hand, labor market participation, income, and religion do not have any significant impact on behavior in the experiment.
Social Capital Investments; Experimental Economics; Representative samples, Experimental Economics, ddc:330, Social Capital Investments, Social Capital Investments, Social Norms, Experiment, Representative Sample, Experiment, C90, Representative samples, Z13, Social Capital Investments;Experimental Economics;Representative samples, Social Capital, Niederlande, C10, experimental economics, representative samples, social capital investments, jel: jel:Z13, jel: jel:C90, jel: jel:C10, jel: jel:D39
Social Capital Investments; Experimental Economics; Representative samples, Experimental Economics, ddc:330, Social Capital Investments, Social Capital Investments, Social Norms, Experiment, Representative Sample, Experiment, C90, Representative samples, Z13, Social Capital Investments;Experimental Economics;Representative samples, Social Capital, Niederlande, C10, experimental economics, representative samples, social capital investments, jel: jel:Z13, jel: jel:C90, jel: jel:C10, jel: jel:D39
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 247 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
