
handle: 10419/152784
In this paper, we study the effectiveness of monetary policy in a severe recession and deflation when nominal interest rates are bounded at zero. We compare two alternative proposals for ameliorating the effect of the zero bound: an exchange-rate peg and price-level targeting. We conduct this quantitative comparison in an empirical macroeconometric model of Japan, the United States and the euro area. Furthermore, we use a stylized micro-founded two-country model to check our qualitative findings. We find that both proposals succeed in generating inflationary expectations and work almost equally well under full credibility of monetary policy. However, price-level targeting may be less effective under imperfect credibility, because the announced price-level target path is not directly observable.
Policy Designs and Consistency, Zero-interest-rate bound, E31 - Price Level, Exchange Rates, Deflation, monetary policy rules, zero interest rate bound, liquidity trap, rational expectations, nominal rigidities, exchange rates, Exchange Rates, liquidity trap, monetary policy rules, nominal rigidities, Zero-interest-rate bound, E58 - Central Banks and Their Policies, E58, nominal rigidities, E52, E31, monetary policy rules, ddc:330, liquidity trap, Policy Coordination, Inflation, E61, E52 - Monetary Policy, E61 - Policy Objectives, jel: jel:E52, jel: jel:E31, jel: jel:E58
Policy Designs and Consistency, Zero-interest-rate bound, E31 - Price Level, Exchange Rates, Deflation, monetary policy rules, zero interest rate bound, liquidity trap, rational expectations, nominal rigidities, exchange rates, Exchange Rates, liquidity trap, monetary policy rules, nominal rigidities, Zero-interest-rate bound, E58 - Central Banks and Their Policies, E58, nominal rigidities, E52, E31, monetary policy rules, ddc:330, liquidity trap, Policy Coordination, Inflation, E61, E52 - Monetary Policy, E61 - Policy Objectives, jel: jel:E52, jel: jel:E31, jel: jel:E58
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
