
Abstract This paper analyzes the links between corporate tax avoidance and the growth of high-powered incentives for managers. A simple model demonstrates the role of feedback effects between tax sheltering and managerial diversion in determining how high-powered incentives influence tax sheltering decisions. A novel measure of corporate tax avoidance (the component of the book-tax gap not attributable to accounting accruals) allows for an investigation of the link between tax avoidance and incentive compensation. Increases in incentive compensation tend to reduce the level of tax sheltering, in a manner consistent with a complementary relationship between diversion and sheltering. In addition, this negative effect is driven primarily by firms with relatively weak governance arrangements, confirming a central prediction of the model. These results can help explain the growing cross-sectional variation among firms in their levels of tax avoidance, the undersheltering puzzle, and why large book-tax gaps are associated with subsequent negative abnormal returns.
Tax Evasion, Economics, Tax Shelters, 336, Stock Options, Tax Avoidance, Incentive Compensation, Incentive Compensation, Tax Avoidance, Tax Evasion, Diversion, Tax Shelters, Stock Options, Diversion, jel: jel:G30, jel: jel:J40, jel: jel:H26, jel: jel:J33, jel: jel:H25
Tax Evasion, Economics, Tax Shelters, 336, Stock Options, Tax Avoidance, Incentive Compensation, Incentive Compensation, Tax Avoidance, Tax Evasion, Diversion, Tax Shelters, Stock Options, Diversion, jel: jel:G30, jel: jel:J40, jel: jel:H26, jel: jel:J33, jel: jel:H25
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1K | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.01% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
