
This article introduces the Potential Payback Period (PPP) — a valuation model initiated by the author — as a mathematically rigorous and conceptually richer alternative to traditional ratios. While the Price-to-Earnings (P/E) and PEG ratios have long been used to assess stock value, they suffer from critical limitations: the P/E ignores growth and discounting, while the PEG applies a simplistic linear adjustment and neglects risk. The PPP corrects these shortcomings by incorporating earnings growth, interest rates, and risk (via CAPM-based discounting) into a unified logarithmic structure. Using tools such as the Gordon Growth Model, Taylor expansion, and L’Hospital’s Rule, the paper shows that the P/E and PEG ratios are special cases of the PPP. As a result, the PPP offers a more consistent, interpretable, and forward-looking metric that aligns with modern financial theory and investor needs.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
