
Legal AI systems are increasingly being adopted by judicial and legal system deployers and providers worldwide to support a range of applications. While they offer potential benefits such as reducing bias, increasing efficiency, and improving accountability, they also pose significant risks, requiring a careful balance between opportunities, and legal and ethical development and deployment. AI literacy, as a legal requirement under the EU AI Act and a critical enabler of ethical AI for deployers and providers, could be a tool to achieve this. The article analyzes the notion of AI literacy, the benefits and risks of legal AI systems, and links them to a broader ethical legal AI system for organizations. The outcome of the article, a roadmap questionnaire as a practical tool for developers and providers to assess risks, benefits, and stakeholder concerns, could be useful in meeting societal and regulatory expectations for legal AI systems.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Computers and Society, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Computers and Society (cs.CY), Computer Science - Human-Computer Interaction, 05.05. Jogtudomány, Information Retrieval (cs.IR), Computer Science - Information Retrieval, Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Computers and Society, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Computers and Society (cs.CY), Computer Science - Human-Computer Interaction, 05.05. Jogtudomány, Information Retrieval (cs.IR), Computer Science - Information Retrieval, Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
