Background:&nbsp;<span>This thesis is a critical contribution by a young aspiring scholar to the field of international criminal law. It explores the complex legacy and legal precedents set by the International Military Tribunal system through three pivotal case studies: </span><strong>Hermann Göring (Nazi Germany)</strong><span>, </span><strong>Slobodan Milošević (Yugoslavia)</strong><span>, and </span><strong>Saddam Hussein (Iraq)</strong><span>. Each case has been examined with a focus on the legal framework applied by their respective tribunals, the challenges faced in delivering justice, and the implications for international law.</span> <p>Going beyond traditional analysis, the thesis proposes <strong>alternate legal solutions</strong> for each trial—considering procedural, political, and humanitarian perspectives—and assesses the <strong>pros and cons of the original decisions</strong> delivered by the tribunals. Through this approach, the work not only reflects on past justice mechanisms but also aims to initiate a broader dialogue on improving the effectiveness, fairness, and perception of international criminal justice.</p> <p>This thesis serves as both a legal analysis and a reflection of youth engagement in international justice discourse, bridging historical cases with contemporary legal thought.</p>