
Overfitting remains a central challenge in modern data science, particularly as complex analytical tools become more accessible and widely applied in fields like chemometrics. This communication outlines a series of common pitfalls that lead to misleading and non-generalizable models-ranging from poor data quality and insufficient sample sizes to misuse of validation strategies and overly complex modeling choices. By illustrating a caricatured protocol for generating bad models, the paper emphasizes the importance of domain knowledge, appropriate experimental design, and rigorous validation. It advocates for "validity by design" as a proactive strategy to ensure robust, interpretable, and scientifically sound results.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
