
We analyze the topical question of how the compensation of elected politicians affects the set of citizens choosing to run. To this end, we develop a sparse and tractable citizen-candidate model of representative democracy with ability differences, informative campaigning and political parties. Our results suggest that primaries, campaign costs and rewards have previously overlooked interactions that should be studied in a unified framework. Surprisingly, increasing the reward may lower the average candidate quality when the campaigning costs are sufficiently high.
J24, D70, D72, virksomhedogpolitik, Public Choice, D79, politicians’ competence, career concerns, campaigning costs, rewards for elected officials; citizen-candidate models, citizen-candidate models, Politisk markedsføring, rewards for elected officials, Politiker, ddc:330, Valgkampe, politik, campaigning costs, kandidater, politik, Politicians' competence; Career concerns; Campaigning costs; Rewards for elected officials; Citizen-candidate models, Wahlkampffinanzierung, career concerns, J4, Diäten, kandidater, Qualifikation, Theorie, politicians' competence, Kompetenz, jel: jel:J24, jel: jel:D70, jel: jel:D72, jel: jel:D79, jel: jel:J4
J24, D70, D72, virksomhedogpolitik, Public Choice, D79, politicians’ competence, career concerns, campaigning costs, rewards for elected officials; citizen-candidate models, citizen-candidate models, Politisk markedsføring, rewards for elected officials, Politiker, ddc:330, Valgkampe, politik, campaigning costs, kandidater, politik, Politicians' competence; Career concerns; Campaigning costs; Rewards for elected officials; Citizen-candidate models, Wahlkampffinanzierung, career concerns, J4, Diäten, kandidater, Qualifikation, Theorie, politicians' competence, Kompetenz, jel: jel:J24, jel: jel:D70, jel: jel:D72, jel: jel:D79, jel: jel:J4
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 62 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
