
Abstract This study argues that the development and functions of the Chinese pragmatic marker (PM) Xle are best understood through a constructional approach. In this construction, X (usually a monosyllabic verb or adjective) combines with le, a current relevant state marker, to form Xle, which conveys a negative evaluative stance—such as impatience, frustration, or disapproval—regardless of X’s original meaning. Repetition of Xle intensifies emotional expression rather than creating redundancy. Focusing on the diachronic development of bale, the earliest attested Xle form, the study shows how it shifted from a syntactic predicate to a stance-taking PM through reanalysis, analogy, and subjectification. Mapping Xle within a constructional network, the paper highlights how form-meaning pairings drive its multifunctionality and alignment with speaker intention. This approach offers broader insights into the emergence of evaluative stance within a dynamic linguistic system.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
