Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Geography, Institutions, and Entrepreneurship

Authors: Farzanegan, Mohammad Reza; Goel, Rajeev K.; Saunoris, James W.;

Geography, Institutions, and Entrepreneurship

Abstract

The geographic spread of nations would pose logistics challenges in production, distribution and servicing, impacting costs, with implications for entrepreneurship. Using panel data from 62 countries spanning the years 2006 to 2021, we find that of the different oceanic geographic dimensions considered, the number of islands undermines entrepreneurship. Thus, the geographic scatter of a nation, in terms of the number of islands, does not foster entrepreneurship. The length of the coastline or being an island itself seem to not matter significantly in this regard. This main finding holds across different modeling variations. As expected, better institutional quality encourages entrepreneurship. The mediation analysis, to dissect the direct and indirect effects (through institutions) of geography reveals that the impact of the number of islands can work through institutional quality (as well as directly) to undermine entrepreneurship. Besides the considering of the number of islands, the spillovers of oceanic geography through institutions on entrepreneurship form the novel contributions of this work. However, the mediation analysis highlights a critical insight: geographic fragmentation, particularly in countries with numerous islands, weakens the positive impact of institutions. This is likely due to institutional fragmentation failing to align with geographic fragmentation. Some implications for policy are discussed.

Keywords

L26, ddc:330, O17, islands, institutions, latitude, mediation analysis., coastline, entrepreneurship, economic freedom, geography, P48

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!