Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Asian Journal of Adv...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
SSRN Electronic Journal
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Investigation on the Shear Performance of Concrete Beams Reinforced with Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) Bars

Authors: Selase A. K. Kpo; Charles K. Kankam; Charles Osei Ababio; Daniel Tetteh Tackie;

Investigation on the Shear Performance of Concrete Beams Reinforced with Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) Bars

Abstract

This paper presents the results of an experimental investigation on the shear behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) beams reinforced with Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) bars. A total of six (6) RC beam specimens of dimensions 120 mm x 200 mm x 2000 mm were cast, consisting of five (5) full GFRP RC beams and one (1) full steel RC beam. The beams comprised normal concrete of strength of 23.4 N/mm² and 30.4 N/mm², reinforcement of 0.7% and 1.13% GFRP main tensile bars and a constant 0.7% GFRP compression reinforcement. A constant 0.65% shear reinforcement ratio (200 mm GFRP stirrup spacing) and a fixed shear span-to-depth ratio of 3.78 were maintained. The mechanical properties of GFRP and steel bars were evaluated, with nominal diameters of 10 mm for stirrups and 12 mm for longitudinal reinforcement. The investigation sought to evaluate the effects of these test variables on the shear performance of the RC beams subjected to a four-point monotonic loading. Experimental results showed that all GFRP RC beams with a 200 mm stirrup spacing failed in diagonal shear, while the control steel RC beam failed in concrete crushing after yielding of the longitudinal tension steel bars, as predicted by the theoretical analysis. ACI provided conservative shear predictions with an estimated average experimental-to-predicted shear capacity ratio (VExp/VPred) of 1.44, a standard deviation (SD) of 0.17 and a coefficient of variation (COV) of 11.79%. With equivalent test variables, GFRP RC beams exhibited lower shear capacities in comparison to the control steel RC beam due to the reduced dowel action of the GFRP bars and their lower modulus of elasticity, which compromised post-cracking transverse stiffness and shear resistance. The study also examined the impact of strain energy absorption in GFRP RC beams on ductility and energy dissipation in relation to the observed failure modes.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Top 10%
Average
Average
gold