Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Acta Biomaterialiaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Acta Biomaterialia
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5...
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Collagen Fiber Density Observed in Metastatic Ovarian Cancer Promotes Tumor Cell Adhesion

Authors: Ali Abbaspour; Ana L. Martinez Cavazos; Roshan Patel; Ning Yang; Stephanie M. McGregor; Erin G. Brooks; Kristyn S. Masters; +1 Authors

Collagen Fiber Density Observed in Metastatic Ovarian Cancer Promotes Tumor Cell Adhesion

Abstract

Collagen type I, a key structural component of the extracellular matrix (ECM), is frequently altered in cancer, with altered fiber organization at the primary tumor site linked to metastasis and poor patient outcomes. Here, we demonstrate that collagen fibers are also altered in metastatic sites such as the omentum of patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Specifically, we observed a significant increase in fiber density, alignment, and width. To determine if the increase in fiber density supports metastasis, we used a semi-interpenetrating methacrylated gelatin (gelMA) network in combination with increasing fibrillar collagen. Cancer cells had significantly increased adhesion as collagen fiber density increased. To determine the responsible mechanisms, we used orthogonal systems to examine 1) the different adhesion peptides exposed in collagen (GFOGER) and gelatin (RGD), and 2) the physical structure of fibers. Cells had minimal response to GFOGER, either alone or in combination with RGD, suggesting that increased adhesion did not result from this collagen-specific interaction. Cell adhesion was significantly higher on electrospun PCL-gelatin fibers compared to flat PCL-gelatin substrates, suggesting that increased cell adhesion resulted from fiber structure. We next investigated the cellular mechanisms involved in increased adhesion on gelMA/coll and found that actin polymerization, but not myosin II contractility, was needed. We further demonstrated that cells on fibrous gels had more robust actin polymerization, and that this resulted in greater adhesion strength. Combined, these results suggest that the increase in collagen fibers with tumor metastasis will support the development of additional metastases. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This work advances the evaluation of the matrisome of the omentum, the most common metastatic site in advanced ovarian cancer by characterizing how collagen fibers change with disease progression. To examine the effect of collagen fibers on metastasis, we utilized a suite of in vitro biomaterials to identify a novel role for collagen fibers in supporting cell adhesion through increased actin dynamics during nascent adhesion formation, which results in increased adhesion strength at later times.

Keywords

Ovarian Neoplasms, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Adhesion, Humans, Gelatin, Female, Collagen, Neoplasm Metastasis, Extracellular Matrix

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Top 10%
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!