
This paper presents different materiality concepts in sustainability reporting. At present, two main streams of materiality concepts in sustainability reporting are single and double materiality. While single materiality primarily deals with the financial impact of sustainability issues on enterprise value (outside-in perspective), double materiality is more far-reaching and deals with both the financial impact and the social impact of companies’ operations, i.e. how companies’ operations affect society and the environment (inside-out perspective). Both concepts are present in leading sustainability reporting standards. The EU has opted to develop its own set of standards and is, in addition to GRI, the main representative of double materiality as the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) place this concept in the spotlight. The IFRS Foundation is the main representative of single materiality. This section will present the main characteristics of both concepts. It will then present the path to standardising reporting standards in the EU. Finally, implications of the different benchmarks employed in standards to define materiality will be explored.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
