
The rapid growth in digital media creation has led to an increased challenge in content moderation. Manual and automated moderation are susceptible to risks associated with a slower response time and false positives arising from unpredictable user inputs respectively. Image caption generation has been suggested as a viable content moderation tool, but there is a lack of real world deployment in this context. In this work, a collaborative approach is taken, where a machine learning model is used to assist human moderators in the approval and rejection of media within a scavenger hunt game. The proposed model is trained on the Flickr30k and MS Coco datasets to generate captions for images. The results demonstrate a 13% reduction in review times, indicating that human–machine collaboration contributes to mitigating the risk of unsustainable review backlog growth. Furthermore, fine-tuning the model led to a 28% reduction in review times when compared to the untuned model. Notably, this paper contributes to knowledge by demonstrating caption generation as a viable content moderation tool in addition to its sensitivity to accurate captions, whereby false positives risk a deterioration in moderator response time.
Caption generation, Electronic computers. Computer science, Machine learning, Content moderation, Q300-390, Computer vision, QA75.5-76.95, Cybernetics
Caption generation, Electronic computers. Computer science, Machine learning, Content moderation, Q300-390, Computer vision, QA75.5-76.95, Cybernetics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
