Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The Impact of Teachers' Assessment Practices on Students' Acquisition of Process Skills and Performance in Basic Science

Authors: Emmanuel Edoja Achor; Peter Ogbu Agogo; Joyce Hassana Musa;

The Impact of Teachers' Assessment Practices on Students' Acquisition of Process Skills and Performance in Basic Science

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine impact of teachers’ assessment practices on students’ acquisition of process skills and performance in basic science in Kogi State, Nigeria, utilizing a cross-sectional survey research design. The sample comprises 393 Basic Eight students from a population of 20,885 in the study area using the multi-stage sampling procedure. Ten Basic Science teachers were observed in class. Data collection instruments include the Basic Science Process Skill Acquisition Test (BSPSAT), the Basic Science Performance Test (BSPT), and the Basic Science Teachers’ Assessment Practices Observation Scale (BSTAPOS). The reliability coefficients were 0.71 for BSPSAT, 0.86 for BSPT using Kuder–Richardson Formula 21, and the BSTAPOS value was 0.66 using Spearman’s rank correlation. The descriptive statistics of mean and standard deviation as well as an independent t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for analysis. Significant differences were found regarding the impact of teachers’ low, moderate, and high classroom assessment practices on the mean process skills acquisition scores and the mean performance scores of students in basic science. Students’ gender did not show a significant difference regarding the impact of teachers’ low, moderate, and high assessment practices on process skills acquisition and performance scores in basic science. It is recommended that teachers of basic science should use assessment guides and workbooks to acquaint themselves with the appropriate assessment practices.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!