
Understanding shear and bond mechanisms becomes crucial in addressing the complexities and uncertainties inherent in designing beam-column joints, especially under seismic conditions. This study proposes employing machine learning as a viable approach for predicting joint shear strength. The study analyses a dataset containing 670 beam-column joints (312 interior and 358 exterior beam-column joints) statistical summaries featuring eight input parameters encompassing the joint's cross-sectional dimensions, reinforcement details, and material properties. Machine learning algorithms, including K-Nearest Neighbours, Support Vector Regressor, Decision Tree, Multilayer Perceptron, Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System, Elastic Net, and Ridge, are fine-tuned using Optuna and evaluated based on performance metrics such as Root Mean Squared Error and R-squared. The study evaluates the performance of machine learning models for predicting joint shear strength in interior (IBCJ) and exterior (EBCJ) beam-column joints, emphasizing the effectiveness of ensemble techniques like stacking regressors. The Stacking Regressor consistently outperformed traditional models and design codes (CSA, ACI, AIJ, IS, GB, EN, and NZS), achieving RMSE values of 1.1407–1.2170 (R²: 0.8180–0.84) for IBCJ and RMSE of 1.02 (R²: 0.84) for EBCJ, compared to code errors exceeding 1.8. SHAP analysis revealed that concrete compressive strength (importance: 0.85 for IBCJ, 0.89 for EBCJ), column reinforcement percentage, and top reinforcement percentage were the most influential features. These findings highlight the potential of ML models to capture complex, non-linear structural behaviour more accurately than conventional methods. Keywords: Beam-Column Joint, Joint Shear Stress, Ensemble techniques, Feature Importance, Stacking Regressor, Algorithms, Machine learning
Ensemble techniques, Beam column joint, Electronic computers. Computer science, Information technology, QA75.5-76.95, Joint shear stress, Stacking regressor, T58.5-58.64, Feature importance
Ensemble techniques, Beam column joint, Electronic computers. Computer science, Information technology, QA75.5-76.95, Joint shear stress, Stacking regressor, T58.5-58.64, Feature importance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
