Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Systems and Soft Com...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Systems and Soft Computing
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Systems and Soft Computing
Article . 2025
Data sources: DOAJ
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4...
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Stacked Generalisation for Improved Prediction of Joint Shear in Beam-Column Joints

Authors: Shruti Shekhar Palkar; T. Palanisamy;

Stacked Generalisation for Improved Prediction of Joint Shear in Beam-Column Joints

Abstract

Understanding shear and bond mechanisms becomes crucial in addressing the complexities and uncertainties inherent in designing beam-column joints, especially under seismic conditions. This study proposes employing machine learning as a viable approach for predicting joint shear strength. The study analyses a dataset containing 670 beam-column joints (312 interior and 358 exterior beam-column joints) statistical summaries featuring eight input parameters encompassing the joint's cross-sectional dimensions, reinforcement details, and material properties. Machine learning algorithms, including K-Nearest Neighbours, Support Vector Regressor, Decision Tree, Multilayer Perceptron, Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System, Elastic Net, and Ridge, are fine-tuned using Optuna and evaluated based on performance metrics such as Root Mean Squared Error and R-squared. The study evaluates the performance of machine learning models for predicting joint shear strength in interior (IBCJ) and exterior (EBCJ) beam-column joints, emphasizing the effectiveness of ensemble techniques like stacking regressors. The Stacking Regressor consistently outperformed traditional models and design codes (CSA, ACI, AIJ, IS, GB, EN, and NZS), achieving RMSE values of 1.1407–1.2170 (R²: 0.8180–0.84) for IBCJ and RMSE of 1.02 (R²: 0.84) for EBCJ, compared to code errors exceeding 1.8. SHAP analysis revealed that concrete compressive strength (importance: 0.85 for IBCJ, 0.89 for EBCJ), column reinforcement percentage, and top reinforcement percentage were the most influential features. These findings highlight the potential of ML models to capture complex, non-linear structural behaviour more accurately than conventional methods. Keywords: Beam-Column Joint, Joint Shear Stress, Ensemble techniques, Feature Importance, Stacking Regressor, Algorithms, Machine learning

Keywords

Ensemble techniques, Beam column joint, Electronic computers. Computer science, Information technology, QA75.5-76.95, Joint shear stress, Stacking regressor, T58.5-58.64, Feature importance

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold