
Abstract Rainfall characteristics such as intensity, duration, and frequency are key determinants of the hydrogeomorphic response of a catchment. The presence of non‐linear and threshold effects makes the relationship between rainfall variability and geomorphological dynamics difficult to quantify. Yet, this is particularly relevant under predicted exacerbated erosion induced by an intensification of hydroclimatic extremes and ensuing erosional processes. In this study, we evaluate the effects of rainfall temporal variability on catchment morphology and sediment erosion, transport, and deposition across diverse grain sizes, catchment shapes, and climates. Specifically, we simulate multiple rainfall realizations using the modified Bartlett‐Lewis rectangular pulse model and assess catchment geomorphic response through the CAESAR‐Lisflood landscape evolution model. Virtual catchments are used in the numerical experiments and simulations are conducted over centennial timescales. Simulation results show that higher rainfall temporal variability increases net sediment discharge, domain erosion, and deposition volumes. Particularly, more arid regions respond more actively to rainfall variations and coarser grain size configurations amplify the hydrogeomorphic response. We derive a power‐law function linking standardized changes in catchment net sediment discharge and fluctuations in rainfall temporal variability, with a consistent exponent across simulations and supported by long‐term observational data. Such quantification of the effects of predicted changes in rainfall patterns on catchment hydromorphological response is crucial to forecasting the implications of expected changes in rainfall patterns for downstream sediment delivery. Results further highlight the need to explicitly account for local variability in rainfall intensification when estimating potential changes in soil erosion fluxes.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
