In recent years, the Constitutional Court of Romania has tried to create an internal wall for not giving effect to the application of the supremacy of European Union law, respectively the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union regarding the rule of law, as regards the Constitution itself, by developing an ultra vires control and an identity control in an original way. Although the pressure to change such an approach is omnipresent, however, the reasons of Decision no. 390/2021 have not been revised until today by the subsequent case law of the Constitutional Court of Romania, but on the contrary, in two press releases, the idea of revising the Constitution for accepting the effects of the relevant case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the matter was launched exclusively. However, a series of somehow sovereignist decisions, also including here the interpretation in its own, extensive manner, of an opinion of the Venice Commission, seems rather on the way to be abandoned, an example in this regard being the recent Decision no. 283/2023, by which the Constitutional Court of Romania restated the need to impose a threshold in the case of the offence of abuse of office.