Urban traffic resilience has gained increased attention, with most studies adopting an engineering perspective that assumes a single optimal equilibrium and prioritizes local recovery. On the other hand, systems may possess multiple metastable states, and ecological resilience is the ability to switch between these states according to perturbations. Control strategies from these two resilience perspectives yield distinct outcomes. In fact, ecological resilience oriented control has rarely been viewed in urban traffic, despite the fact that traffic system is a complex system in highly uncertain environment with possible multiple metastable states. This absence highlights the necessity for urban traffic ecological resilience definition. To bridge this gap, we defines urban traffic ecological resilience as the ability to absorb uncertain perturbations by shifting to alternative states. The goal is to generate a system with greater adaptability, without necessarily returning to the original equilibrium. Our control framework comprises three aspects: portraying the recoverable scopes; designing alternative steady states; and controlling system to shift to alternative steady states for adapting large disturbances. Among them, the recoverable scopes are portrayed by attraction region; the alternative steady states are set close to the optimal state and outside the attraction region of the original equilibrium; the controller needs to ensure the local stability of the alternative steady states, without changing the trajectories inside the attraction region of the original equilibrium. Comparisons with classical engineering resilience oriented urban traffic resilience control schemes show that, proposed ecological resilience oriented control schemes can generate greater resilience. These results will contribute to the fundamental theory of future resilient intelligent transportation system.