
Bollworms and sap-sucking insect pests are a significant constraint to cotton production in Africa. Manual topping of cotton plants, which consists of cutting off the top of the plant, i.e. the terminal bud of the main stem, is a promising alternative to chemical control by removing resources for certain pests or inducing plant defences. In this study, we evaluated the level of protection by topping against bollworms and sap-sucking insect pests and the effect of topping on seed cotton yield. Six experiments combining insecticide protection (sprayed vs. unsprayed plots) and topping (topped vs. non-topped plots) were conducted in Mali and Senegal. Topping by itself conferred weak protection against bollworms with an 11% reduction in the proportion of damaged shed squares and bolls, compared to insecticide protection (55%). Topping had a low to moderate effectiveness in reducing the incidence of sap-sucking pests (20 to 48%), but equivalent to insecticide treatments. Although topping significantly reduced the proportion of damaged bolls (31%) at harvest in the absence of insecticide protection, this did not substantially affect seed cotton yield (+4%), unlike insecticide protection (+52%). However, this technique could be advantageously combined with threshold-based interventions integrating biopesticides to reduce the environmental impact of crop protection in cotton.
H01 - Protection des végétaux - Considérations générales, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1926, insecte nuisible, lutte antiravageur, lutte anti-insecte, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5726, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5729, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_26768, ravageur des plantes, protection de l'environnement, protection des plantes, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3885, gestion intégrée des ravageurs, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1021, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6970, Gossypium, étêtage, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16196, coton, H10 - Ravageurs des plantes, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4540, dégât, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34030, insecticide d'origine végétale, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5978, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3335, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15898, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_25090
H01 - Protection des végétaux - Considérations générales, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1926, insecte nuisible, lutte antiravageur, lutte anti-insecte, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5726, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5729, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_26768, ravageur des plantes, protection de l'environnement, protection des plantes, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3885, gestion intégrée des ravageurs, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1021, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6970, Gossypium, étêtage, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16196, coton, H10 - Ravageurs des plantes, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4540, dégât, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34030, insecticide d'origine végétale, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5978, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3335, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15898, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_25090
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
