
This study compares multiple image processing and deep learning methods to demonstrate an enhanced approach to glaucoma diagnosis. The approach focuses on noise reduction using median filtering and optic disc segmentation utilizing the U-Net and U-Net+ architectures. Capsule Networks were utilized for feature extraction and Extreme Learning Machines (ELM) for diagnostic classification. Three datasets were evaluated, including DRISHTI-GS, DRIONS-DB, and HRF, utilizing important parameters such as accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. The findings revealed that median filtering reduced noise by 97.88%, with a peak signal-to-noise ratio of 44.99. U-Net beat U-Net+ in optic disc in the process of segmentation with a Dice coefficient of 0.8557, a Jaccard index of 0.7307, and higher segmentation accuracy. The suggested model has great diagnostic accuracy, scoring 99% for DRISHTI-GS, 99.5% for DRIONS-DB, and 98.5% for HRF. These findings show that using deep learning approaches can increase glaucoma diagnosis accuracy and reliability, with important implications for healthcare applications and patient outcomes.
DRIONS-DB, Medicine (General), Optic Disk, Reproducibility of Results, Glaucoma, Signal-To-Noise Ratio, Sensitivity and Specificity, Frame networks, Retinal intra-ocular region, R5-920, Deep Learning, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, U-NET layers, DRISHTI-GS
DRIONS-DB, Medicine (General), Optic Disk, Reproducibility of Results, Glaucoma, Signal-To-Noise Ratio, Sensitivity and Specificity, Frame networks, Retinal intra-ocular region, R5-920, Deep Learning, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, U-NET layers, DRISHTI-GS
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
