
handle: 10419/330632 , 10419/323273
Abstract Optimal experimental designs are used in chemical engineering to obtain precise mathematical models. The optimal design consists of design points with a maximal amount of information and thus lead to more precise models than statistical designs. In general, the optimal design depends on an uncertain estimate of unknown model parameters $$\theta $$ . The optimal designs are therefore also uncertain and continuously shift in the design space, as the value of $$\theta $$ changes. We present two approaches to capture this behavior when computing optimal designs, a global clustering approach and a local approximation of the confidence regions. Both methods find an optimal design and assign the optimal design points confidence regions which can be used by an experimenter to decide which design points to use. The clustering approach requires a Monte Carlo sampling of the uncertain parameters and then identifies regions of high weight density in the design space. The local approximation of the confidence regions is obtained via an error propagation using the derivatives of the optimal design points and weights. We apply the introduced approaches to mathematical examples as well as to an application example modeling vapor-liquid equilibria.
ddc:510, Optimal statistical designs, Parametric tolerance and confidence regions, confidence regions, optimal experimental design, Optimal experimental design, Confidence regions, robust optimization, Robustness and adaptive procedures (parametric inference), Robust optimization
ddc:510, Optimal statistical designs, Parametric tolerance and confidence regions, confidence regions, optimal experimental design, Optimal experimental design, Confidence regions, robust optimization, Robustness and adaptive procedures (parametric inference), Robust optimization
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
