Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
SSRN Electronic Journal
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

An analysis of the European Industrial Carbon Management Strategy consultation: Who makes the normative decisions?

Authors: Määttä, Senni; Covarrubias, Moises; de Gooyert, Vincent;

An analysis of the European Industrial Carbon Management Strategy consultation: Who makes the normative decisions?

Abstract

Abstract Establishing a framework for carbon management in Europe relies on collaboration between diverse actors. The European Industrial Carbon Management Strategy (the Strategy) is going through its last phase. As announced by the European Commission, the first quartile of 2024 will witness the deliberation of the Strategy. In the summer of 2023, a public consultation, and a call for evidence on the Strategy provided valuable stakeholder perspectives on the challenges and possible solutions for carbon management in Europe. This paper presents an analysis of these stakeholder perspectives and what input they give of the problems and solutions to carbon management. All submissions (n = 205) to the call for evidence were synthesised using qualitative system dynamics modelling. We found two dominant approaches to carbon management, a market-driven approach and a society-driven approach. Aligning carbon management within broader decarbonisation and fostering collaboration, requires a society-driven approach. A market-driven approach on the other hand provides high financial incentives. Our analysis suggests a conflict between a market-driven approach and collaboration, as a purely market-driven approach worsens the barriers to a collaborative approach, such as power and resource imbalance and a lack of facilitative leadership. Therefore, a careful balance between the two is required. This leads to several policy insights presented at the beginning of this paper.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Funded by
Related to Research communities