Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Epilepsiaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Epilepsia
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4...
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

The Effect of Epilepsy Surgery on Tonic-Clonic Seizures

Authors: Juan Luis Alcala‐Zermeno; Marina Romozzi; Michael R. Sperling;

The Effect of Epilepsy Surgery on Tonic-Clonic Seizures

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveEpilepsy surgery outcomes tend to be judged by the percentage in seizure reduction without considering the effect on specific seizure types, particularly tonic–clonic seizures, which produce the greatest morbidity and mortality. We assess how often focal to bilateral tonic–clonic seizures (BTCS) stop and how often they appear de novo after epilepsy surgery.MethodsAnalysis of a prospectively maintained epilepsy surgery database between 1986 and 2022 that characterizes the burden of BTCS after resective epilepsy surgery. Patients were stratified according to presence or absence of preoperative BTCS and whether these were active (defined as ≥1 BTCS/year prior to surgery) or remote.ResultsA total of 804 patients were followed for a median of 7 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 3–13 years) after epilepsy surgery, most being temporal lobe resections (91%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 89–93%). At last visit, 72% of patients (95% CI = 69–75%) were seizure‐free for 1 year or more. Of 521 patients with preoperative BTCS, 300 (58%, 95% CI = 53%–61%) no longer had them after surgery. BTCS recurred in 221 patients, but 128 of them (58%, 95% CI = 51%–64%) had no BTCS in the last year of follow‐up. Those patients who continued to experience BTCS after surgery had a median reduction of 92% in yearly BTCS frequency (IQR = 65%–98%, p < .001). Of 283 patients with no preoperative BTCS, 17 developed de novo BTCS (6%, 95% CI = 4%–9%), with a median of 2 BTCS during the entire follow‐up period. Forty‐seven percent (95% CI = 42%–53%) of patients without preoperative BTCS became seizure‐free after surgery, compared with 33% (95% CI = 29–37, p < .001) of patients with preoperative BTCS.SignificanceEpilepsy surgery markedly reduces or eliminates BTCS, which should have a potential positive impact on morbidity and mortality. This favors offering surgery even if the chance of seizure freedom is not high and calls for a new surgical outcome scale to factor in seizure severity reduction.

Keywords

Male, Adult, Epilepsy, Adolescent, Middle Aged, Neurosurgical Procedures, Young Adult, Treatment Outcome, Seizures, Humans, Female, Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic, Child, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!