
We formulate a rule for allocating asylum seekers that is based on the social preferences of the native workers of the receiving countries. To derive the rule, we construct for each country a social welfare function, SWF, where the social welfare of a population is determined both by the population's aggregate absolute income and by the population's aggregate relative income. In a utilitarian manner, we combine the social welfare functions of the countries into a global social welfare function, GSWF. We look for the allocation that yields the highest value of the GSWF. We draw on assumptions that pertain to the manner in which the asylum seekers join the income distribution of the native workers: we consider a case in which the arrival of the asylum seekers has only a minor effect on the absolute income of the native population, and in which following their admission and integration, the asylum seekers join the income distribution of the native population "from below," namely the incomes of the asylum seekers are lower than the incomes of the low-income native workers. The arrival of asylum seekers can, however, measurably affect the relative incomes of the native population. Our rule states that the share of asylum seekers to be optimally assigned to each country depends only on the aggregate of the income excesses experienced by the native populations in the receiving countries.
policy formation, J48, 330, global social welfare, ddc:320, Asylum seekers, ddc:300, J68, Rule of allocation, D78, I31, C54, Global social welfare, relative deprivation, I38, J15, ddc:330, 320, 300, O15, D62, E61, Relative deprivation, rule of allocation, F22, F68, F62, Policy formation, asylum seekers, E65
policy formation, J48, 330, global social welfare, ddc:320, Asylum seekers, ddc:300, J68, Rule of allocation, D78, I31, C54, Global social welfare, relative deprivation, I38, J15, ddc:330, 320, 300, O15, D62, E61, Relative deprivation, rule of allocation, F22, F68, F62, Policy formation, asylum seekers, E65
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
