Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
SSRN Electronic Jour...arrow_drop_down
SSRN Electronic Journal
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://dx.doi.org/10.34989/sw...
Other literature type . 2024
Data sources: Datacite
EconStor
Research . 2024
Data sources: EconStor
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Central Bank Digital Currency and Banking Choices

Authors: Li, Jiaqi; Usher, Andrew; Zhu, Yu;

Central Bank Digital Currency and Banking Choices

Abstract

Dans quelle mesure une monnaie numérique de banque centrale (MNBC) concurrence-t-elle les dépôts bancaires? Pour répondre à cette question, nous élaborons et estimons un modèle structurel dans lequel chaque ménage choisit l’institution financière où déposer son argent numérique. Les ménages évaluent les intérêts servis sur l’argent numérique, la possibilité d’obtenir des produits financiers complémentaires et l’accès aux services en succursale. Une MNBC ne portant pas intérêt et non assortie de produits financiers complémentaires ne peut évincer dans une large mesure les dépôts bancaires que si elle est associée à un réseau de services étendu. L’imposition d’une limite élevée à la détention de MNBC atténuerait efficacement cet effet d’éviction.

To what extent does a central bank digital currency (CBDC) compete with bank deposits? To answer this question, we develop and estimate a structural model where each household chooses which financial institution to deposit their digital money with. Households value the interest paid on digital money, the possibility of obtaining complementary financial products, and the access to in-branch services. A non-interest-bearing CBDC that does not provide complementary financial products can substantially crowd out bank deposits only if it provides an extensive service network. Imposing a large limit on CBDC holding would effectively mitigate this crowding out.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Digital currencies and fintech, E50, ddc:330, Central bank research, E58

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!