Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
SSRN Electronic Jour...arrow_drop_down
SSRN Electronic Journal
Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
SSRN Electronic Journal
Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
UQ eSpace
Research . 2023
Data sources: UQ eSpace
EconStor
Research . 2023
Data sources: EconStor
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

The heritability of economic preferences

Authors: Kettlewell, Nathan; Tymula, Agnieszka; Yoo, Hong Il;

The heritability of economic preferences

Abstract

Our study explores a key question about why people make different economic choices, especially when dealing with risk and delayed rewards. Why do some people prefer taking risks, like starting a business, while others prefer secure jobs? Why do some spend their money now rather than saving for the future? We want to know if these choices are influenced more by a person's surroundings or their genetic makeup. Understanding this can help us see how these varied preferences might lead to different life results, such as wealth or poverty. Our research shows that the way people handle risk and how they value the present versus the future are more influenced by their own experiences in society than by their genes or how they were raised. We found that personal experiences unique to each individual play the biggest role in shaping these preferences. In fact, when it comes to how much value people place on immediate rewards over future ones, genetics don't seem to play any role at all. Interestingly, our study also found that genetics have a stronger influence on how people perceive risk than previously thought. People's attitudes towards time and future rewards seem to be more changeable and influenced by their experiences than their attitudes towards risk. This is a key point for making policies. When we looked at other studies, especially those involving twins, we noticed that the environment that twins share, like their home life, didn't seem to have much effect on their personal preferences. This made us wonder if the home environment and parenting really make a difference. But, when we used more complex models in our study, we found that the shared home environment actually does have an impact. It affects risk preferences by about 15% and time preferences by 33%, which is much more than what was previously thought. Particularly noteworthy is that the home environment influences attitudes towards time and future rewards twice as much as it does towards risk. This finding gives us new insights for policy-making and parenting.

Keywords

C93, D81, ambiguity aversion, time preferences, ddc:330, Z13, Institute for Social Science Research, D91, genetics, D15, twin study, risk preferences

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!