
arXiv: 2403.07226
Some theories on data flow security are based on order-theoretical concepts, most commonly on lattice concepts. This paper presents a correspondence between security concepts and partial order concepts, by which the former become an application of the latter. The formalization involves concepts of data flow, equivalence classes of entities that can access the same data, and labels. Efficient, well-known algorithms to obtain one of these from one of the others are presented. Security concepts such as secrecy (also called confidentiality), integrity and conflict can be expressed in this theory. Further, it is shown that complex tuple labels used in the literature to express security levels can be translated into equivalent set labels. A consequence is that any network's data flow or access control relationships can be defined by assigning simple set labels to the entities. Finally, it is shown how several partial orders can be combined when different data flows must coexist.
7 pages, 1 figure
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Cryptography and Security, Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Cryptography and Security, Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
