
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.457522
Ambidextrous organizations are supposed to innovate successfully both in case of evolutionary and revolutionary change through managing multiple and contradicting organizational architectures. This paper extends the theory on ambidextrous organizations through an explorative double case study of the structural and cultural aspects of successful incremental and radical innovations in one organization. Empirical data and theory are compared iteratively to define and elaborate the key concepts and patterns. We discuss four main findings on the management of the 'hardware', the structure, and 'software', the culture, of the ambidextrous organization.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
