
In this paper, we study the risk-sharing problem among multiple agents using lambda value at risk ([Formula: see text]) as their preferences via the tool of inf-convolution, where [Formula: see text] is an extension of value at risk ([Formula: see text]). We obtain explicit formulas of the inf-convolution of multiple [Formula: see text] with monotone Λ and explicit forms of the corresponding optimal allocations, extending the results of the inf-convolution of [Formula: see text]. It turns out that the inf-convolution of several [Formula: see text] is still a [Formula: see text] under some mild condition. Moreover, we investigate the inf-convolution of one [Formula: see text] and a general monotone risk measure without cash additivity, including [Formula: see text], expected utility, and rank-dependent expected utility as special cases. The expression of the inf-convolution and the explicit forms of the optimal allocation are derived, leading to some partial solution of the risk-sharing problem with multiple [Formula: see text] for general Λ functions. Finally, we discuss the risk-sharing problem with [Formula: see text], another definition of lambda value at risk. We focus on the inf-convolution of [Formula: see text] and a risk measure that is consistent with the second-order stochastic dominance, deriving very different expression of the inf-convolution and the forms of the optimal allocations.
rank-dependent expected utility, 330, distortion risk measure, lambda value at risk, expected utility, expected shortfall, inf-convolution, risk sharing, 510, Statistical methods; risk measures, value at risk
rank-dependent expected utility, 330, distortion risk measure, lambda value at risk, expected utility, expected shortfall, inf-convolution, risk sharing, 510, Statistical methods; risk measures, value at risk
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
