
handle: 10419/282097 , 10419/279163 , 10419/278534
Are reforms towards individual taxation politically feasible? Are they desirable from a welfare perspective? We develop a method to answer such questions and apply it to the US federal income tax since the 1960s. Main findings are: As of today, Pareto-improvements require a move away from joint taxation. Revenue-neutral reforms towards individual taxation are not Pareto-improving, but attract majoritysupport. Such reforms are rejected by Rawlsian welfare measures and supported by ones with weights that are increasing in the secondary earner’s income share. Thus, there is a tension between the welfare of “the poor” and the welfare of “working women.”
Tax reforms, 330, ddc:330, tax reforms, non-linear income taxation, optimal taxation, taxation of couples, Optimal taxation, political economy, C72, D82, Non-linear income taxation, D72, Political economy, H21, Taxation of couples
Tax reforms, 330, ddc:330, tax reforms, non-linear income taxation, optimal taxation, taxation of couples, Optimal taxation, political economy, C72, D82, Non-linear income taxation, D72, Political economy, H21, Taxation of couples
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
