
Motivated by the novel paradigm developed by Van Roy and coauthors for reinforcement learning in arbitrary non-Markovian environments, we propose a related formulation and explicitly pin down the error caused by non-Markovianity of observations when the Q-learning algorithm is applied on this formulation. Based on this observation, we propose that the criterion for agent design should be to seek good approximations for certain conditional laws. Inspired by classical stochastic control, we show that our problem reduces to that of recursive computation of approximate sufficient statistics. This leads to an autoencoder-based scheme for agent design which is then numerically tested on partially observed reinforcement learning environments.
19 pages, accepted for publication at Systems and Control Letters
FOS: Computer and information sciences, recursively computed sufficient statistics, Computer Science - Machine Learning, agent design, Multi-agent systems, Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence, partially observed MDP, Stochastic learning and adaptive control, Systems and Control (eess.SY), Non-Markovian processes: estimation, Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Systems and Control, Machine Learning (cs.LG), Q-learning, FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, curse of non-Markovianity
FOS: Computer and information sciences, recursively computed sufficient statistics, Computer Science - Machine Learning, agent design, Multi-agent systems, Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence, partially observed MDP, Stochastic learning and adaptive control, Systems and Control (eess.SY), Non-Markovian processes: estimation, Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Systems and Control, Machine Learning (cs.LG), Q-learning, FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, curse of non-Markovianity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
