
This paper provides a general model of stablecoins, cryptocurrencies pegged to a traditional currency. We characterize the optimal design of a stablecoin protocol that generates seigniorage fees from issuance. We use this framework to assess the ability of various protocol designs to maintain the peg. Our model rationalizes algorithmic backing of stablecoins but highlights its greater fragility relative to collateralization. Immutable smart contracts improve stability because the issuer suffers from a commitment problem. Even under full collateralization, promises to repurchase stablecoins when demand drops are not credible. Alternatively, the protocol can restore commitment by decentralizing issuance, and this highlights a new benefit of DeFi protocols. This paper was accepted by Will Cong, finance. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.06992 .
Cryptocurrencies, Target Leverage, Dynamic Games, Stablecoins, Coase Conjecture, G12, E42
Cryptocurrencies, Target Leverage, Dynamic Games, Stablecoins, Coase Conjecture, G12, E42
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
