
handle: 10419/31695
The case for fiscal policy and for governments to manipulate on their budgets as appropriate with the specific objective of achieving high levels of employment arises from Kaleckian and Keynesian propositions. Put simply, the latter argue that no market mechanisms are in place to ensure that the level of aggregate demand is sufficient for high levels of economic activity (Kalecki, 1939; Keynes, 1936). Even so, many lines of argument have been developed to the effect that budget deficits and fiscal policy are ineffectual and/or have undesired (and undesirable) effects. Indeed, a great deal of work has been undertaken recently on the significance of fiscal consolidation. Countries only have to balance their budgets, run surpluses during the upswing, and expansion is in place (we have rehearsed and rejected many of these arguments in Arestis and Sawyer, 2003).
ddc:330, fiscal policy, functional finance, Ricardian Equivalence Theorem, inter-temporal budget constraint, jel: jel:E62, jel: jel:H30
ddc:330, fiscal policy, functional finance, Ricardian Equivalence Theorem, inter-temporal budget constraint, jel: jel:E62, jel: jel:H30
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
