
In recent years, road traffic accidents, as a leading cause of accidental deaths, have been attracting more and more attention across several disciplines. Notably, the feature study on accidents severity can help exactly identify causality between different risk factors and road accidents, thereby substantially improving road traffic safety. Meanwhile, the application of data visualization to traffic safety investigations is still lacking. Motivated by this, we incorporate the visualization method into machine learning to analyze the traffic accidents data of the UK in 2017. A hybrid algorithm, namely Light Gradient Boosting Machine-Tree-structured Parzen Estimator (LightGBM-TPE) is proposed. Compared with other typical machine learning algorithms, it performs better in terms of the metrics f1,accuracy, recall and precision. Using LightGBM-TPE to calculate the SHAP value of each feature, we find that “Longitude”, “Latitude”, “Hour” and “Day_of_Week” are four risk factors most closely related with accident severity. Visualization for the data further verifies this conclusion. Overall, our research tries to explore an innovative way to understand and evaluate feature importance of road traffic accidents, which can help suggest effective solutions to improve traffic safety.
Funding Information: This work is supported by Foundation of Hebei University of Technology , Tianjin, China, under grants 280000-104 . Funding Information: This work is supported by Foundation of Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China, under grants 280000-104. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors
Peer reviewed
ta113, Data visualization, LightGBM-TPE, Traffic accidents severity, Feature importance
ta113, Data visualization, LightGBM-TPE, Traffic accidents severity, Feature importance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 96 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
