Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

High Prevalence of Rectal <i>Chlamydia trachomatis</i> Infection with the Same Genotype as Urogenital Infection in Female Outpatients in Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinics in China

Authors: Yan Han; Kai Chen; Jing-Wei Liu; Bang-Yong Zhu; Ke Zhou; Mei-Qin Shi; Wen-Qi Xu; +3 Authors

High Prevalence of Rectal <i>Chlamydia trachomatis</i> Infection with the Same Genotype as Urogenital Infection in Female Outpatients in Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinics in China

Abstract

Objectives: Little is known about rectal Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infection in outpatients attending sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics in China. In this study, we aimed to explore the clinical and epidemiologic features of rectal CT infection in this population. Methods: A cross-sectional study which was conducted among these patients in Tianjin (northern China) and Guangxi (southern China) from June 2018 to August 2020. Bidirectionally sequences were used to analyze CT ompA genotype. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were developed to explore the association of different risk factors for urogenital and rectal CT infection. Results: A total of 1,382 patients were included in the final analyses. The prevalence of urogenital and rectal CT was 11.2% (154/1374) and 4.9% (68/1377) respectively. The rectal CT prevalence among female and male patients was 7.8% (60/767) and 1.3% (8/610) respectively. The three most common genotypes in urogenital CT samples were genotype E (41/137, 29.9%), J (27/137, 19.7%) and D (21/137, 15.3%), while the most common genotypes among rectal CT positive samples were genotype J (11/47, 23.4%), E (10/47, 21.3%) and D (9/47, 19.2%). More than 85% (52/60) of women infected with rectal CT were co-infected with urogenital CT. About 90.0% (36/40) of women shared the same genotype with urogenital samples. Age under 25 and infected NG were selected as risk factors for urogenital CT, while female patients and patients infected with urogenital CT were the risk factors for rectal CT infection. High proportion of rectal CT infection had concurrent urogenital CT infection especially in women, and most of the co-infections were shared among the same genotypes. Conclusions: It would be prudent to encourage awareness, introduce detections tests and treatment strategies for rectal CT infection particularly in female patients visiting STD clinics in China, irrespective of presence of rectal symptoms and history of anal intercourse. Funding Information: This work was supported by the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Initiative for Innovative Medicine (grant 2016-I2M-3-021). Declaration of Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work. Ethics Approval Statement: This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Institute of Dermatology, the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (approval number 2017-LS-021).

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!