
This article examines the recent decision in Wotton v Queensland (No 5) through the lens of epistemic injustice. In Wotton, the Federal Court found that police contravened the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 in their response to the death of an Aboriginal man in custody on Palm Island in 2004. The decision is a landmark for police accountability, but it also provides a striking example of an Australian court confronting and condemning epistemic injustice: the distinctive wrongs that may be done to a person as a knower.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
