
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3876199
In light of the significant impact COVID-19 is having on the operation of the courts, JUSTICE are concerned to ensure that access to justice and fair adjudication can be maintained. In early April 2020, JUSTICE organized two experimental virtual jury trials with the support of AVMI and Corker Binning solicitors. These were designed to explore whether it will be possible for a fair trial to take place when all of the participants were appearing from different physical locations. Volunteers to play the various roles in the trial were recruited from amongst JUSTICE members. This report has been commissioned by JUSTICE with the following objectives: to evaluate how well the technology worked in the virtual trials; to compare the conduct of the trial with traditional face to face hearings; to consider whether there are any benefits to virtual trials; to appraise whether there were any problems that arose which might give cause for a legal challenge; and to evaluate what lessons might be learnt from the two virtual trials conducted to date.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
