
handle: 11250/2767151 , 10419/249140
Recent descriptive work suggests the type of college education (field or institution) is an important but neglected pathway through which individuals sort into homogeneous marriages. These descriptive studies raise the question of why college graduates are so likely to marry someone within their own institution or field of study. One possible explanation is that individuals match on traits correlated with the choice of education, such as innate ability, tastes or family environment. Another possible explanation is that the choice of college education causally impacts whether and whom one marries, either because of search frictions or preferences for spousal education. The goal of this paper is to sort out these explanations and, by doing so, examine the role of colleges as marriage markets. Using data from Norway to address key identification and measurement challenges, we find that colleges are local marriage markets, mattering greatly for whom one marries, not because of the pre-determined traits of the admitted students but as a direct result of attending a particular institution at a given time.
ddc:330, I23, Partnerwahl, I24, J12, Hochschule, college, marriage market, Field of study, Marriage market, Akademiker, College, field of study, Search frictions, Assortative mating, assortative mating, D13, Educational homogamy, search frictions, Ehe, educational homogamy, Norwegen
ddc:330, I23, Partnerwahl, I24, J12, Hochschule, college, marriage market, Field of study, Marriage market, Akademiker, College, field of study, Search frictions, Assortative mating, assortative mating, D13, Educational homogamy, search frictions, Ehe, educational homogamy, Norwegen
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
